LCA Tejas: From National Triumph to an Accountability Crisis at HAL

The Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas was never just another fighter jet. It was a statement of intent. Born in the aftermath of sanctions imposed after Pokhran-II, the programme symbolised India’s determination to achieve strategic autonomy despite global isolation. When a visibly delighted Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee named it Tejas ~ the radiance it captured the national mood.

Years later, another Prime Minister flew a sortie in the same aircraft, underlining how far India had come technologically, politically, and strategically. Few indigenous defence programmes anywhere in the world enjoy such continuity of political endorsement. By any objective measure, the LCA programme itself remains a national success story.

Yet, paradoxically, this very success has been overshadowed by an avoidable crisis, one that is no longer about technology, but about institutional failure and accountability.

From Pride to Public Disappointment

The contrast could not be starker. From Prime Ministers celebrating the aircraft, India now finds its Air Chief publicly expressing dissatisfaction, bluntly stating that flying the aircraft did not deliver the expected confidence “Mazza nahi aaya.”

Such remarks are unprecedented in their candour and should have triggered immediate introspection within Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL). Instead, what followed was a defensive posture, press releases, explanations, and justifications rather than acceptance of responsibility.

This is not how a strategic aerospace organisation should respond when its primary customer, the Indian Air Force (IAF), signals a loss of confidence.

Delivery Delays: No Longer Justifiable

Global supply chain disruptions and complex technological integration challenges are real. They are acknowledged. The IAF itself understands them. However, understanding cannot become a permanent shield against accountability.

The LCA Mk1A delays have crossed that threshold.

Despite being given months if not years to resolve known hiccups, HAL has failed to meet committed delivery timelines. Worse, attempts to push incomplete aircraft onto the IAF under the guise of “later upgrades” cross an unacceptable line. For a combat air force facing real-world threats, inducting partially compliant fighters is not a minor compromise, it is an operational risk. We will induct and improve “tollgate” was crossed with Tejas Mk1, MK1A is expected to be a complete jet and order of 180 in two lot explains that.

At this stage, continued delays are not a technical problem. They are a management and execution failure.

HAL’s Leadership Problem: Time for Structural Reform

The crisis surrounding LCA Mk1A exposes a deeper issue within HAL: an organisation struggling with agility, decision-making speed, and proactive problem resolution.

India’s most critical aerospace manufacturer cannot afford:

  • Slow internal approvals
  • Risk-averse leadership
  • Defensive communication instead of transparent accountability

HAL urgently needs a leadership overhaul, potentially including lateral induction from outside the traditional PSU ecosystem leaders who understand modern aerospace project management, global supply chains, and rapid issue escalation frameworks.

Without this reform, even future programmes like AMCA risk inheriting the same structural weaknesses.

Treating Indian Industry as Partners, Not Rivals

Equally concerning is HAL’s persistent preference for screwdriver-assembled imported subsystems, often Israeli, over maturing Indian solutions. While foreign systems have their place, the reflexive sidelining of Indian industry reflects a short-sighted mindset. Uttam from 21st unit to 41st and then from 84th unit is absolute cinema.

India’s private defence ecosystem is no longer immature. It has proven capabilities across avionics, structures, sensors, and mission systems. Treating domestic firms as adversaries rather than partners directly undermines the goal of Atmanirbhar Bharat.

The country’s most important aviation institution must lead integration not resist it.

Accountability Cannot Be Deferred Any Longer

The mess created around LCA Mk1A deliveries must be openly acknowledged, not papered over. Responsibility must be fixed not to scapegoat engineers, but to address systemic leadership and decision-making failures.

India has invested decades, billions, and immense strategic capital into the LCA programme. The aircraft deserves better stewardship. So does the Indian Air Force.

Save the Programme by Fixing the Institution

The LCA Tejas is not the failure. HAL’s current approach is.

India does not need to abandon indigenous programmes it needs to reform the institutions executing them. Accountability, leadership renewal, and genuine partnership with Indian industry are no longer optional. They are essential.

If HAL does not course-correct now, it risks turning one of India’s greatest aerospace achievements into a cautionary tale something the nation can ill afford at this critical juncture.

3 thoughts on “LCA Tejas: From National Triumph to an Accountability Crisis at HAL

  1. US company Ge delaying engines is the fault of HAL. How come. what kind of foolish article is this. Ge and Is is intentionally delaying the engine. Why some ullo k patte Indians are blaming Hal for that. Dont make defense deal with Usa. US also delayed Apache helicopter. But you don’t balle them. That also Hal should be banned

    1. how long are we going to use GE engines as an excuse? 6 engines have been delivered and there is no progress. educate yourself before passing ignorant comments

  2. This article can be as stupid as it can get without any real knowledge that DRDO and HAL can face. World over thd goverment spent Billions of dollars to design and develop a jet engine and in India they are literally asking for free. With no research or testing facility you expect a jet engine with no funds. And veg me what has the IAF guys done to help the cause, continuous design and requirement change. Our IAF guys are real jokers with no sense of there own. Give the GTRE 2 to 5 billion dollars and a 5 to 10 years time of free hand and see the magic they can deliver.

    What India cannot spent $5 billion? Then just fuck off man and because dependent country forever.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *